Quick! What do 1994 and 2010 have in common?
Besides . . . lots?
In 1994, Dan Rostenkowski, then Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, was convicted of felony fraud charges.
In 2010, Charlie Rangel, Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, is found guilty of ethics violations. (And BO says it’s time for him to go.)
In 1994, Democrats were on the ropes after winning the House, the Senate, and the White House.
In 2010, Democrats are on the ropes after winning the House and Senate in 2006 and the White House in 2008.
In 1994, Republican conservatives ran a national campaign to win the House and Senate.
In 2010, Republican conservatives, bolstered by a massive grassroots movement, is running a national campaign to win the House and Senate.
How will it all end?
Popularity: 3% [?]
![[del.icio.us]](http://images.del.icio.us/static/img/delicious.small.gif){kind=small}
BJC’s Overlord
Steven Lipstein is president of BJC Hospitals. He is part of well-funded, national campaign to deny Missourians the right to NOT purchase something they don’t want.
In a preposterous letter to his employees, Lipstein attempts to argue that human beings have no right to say “no” to health insurance. As self-anointed overlord of our spending, Lipstein questions the very foundations of America’s guiding philosophy when he writes:
Can a citizen decide not to buy health care services, and with that decision, not be required to buy health insurance? The answer is not as straightforward.
Really, Steven? Because you sell medicine, you deny me the right not to buy it?
He goes on:
So, is an individual’s choice not to purchase health insurance an issue of "freedom"?
When educated men start to believe that human beings have no right to NOT buy something, despotism lives.
John Dickinson of Pennsylvania explained rights 240 years ago:
Kings or parliaments could not give the rights essential to happiness . . . They are not annexed to us by parchments and seals. They are created in us by the decrees of Providence, which established laws of our nature. They are born with us; exist within us; and cannot be taken from us by any human power, without taking our lives. In short, they are founded on the immutable maxims of reason and justice.
Dickinson perfectly stated the basic belief of the United States. But let’s look quickly at the consequences of Dickinson’s words.
If our rights are inherent in our nature as human beings, then they exist independently of any government, any industry, any technology, or any invention. Adam and Eve after the fall had precisely the same rights as a child born in Barnes Hospital as I type. Rights cannot be added or subtracted by humans.
If man does not, in 2010, have the right to not own insurance, he never had the right not to own insurance. Again, rights cannot be added or subtracted.
Nor can healthcare be a right. No one can be compel someone else to become a physician. If we are free to choose to be doctors are not, are we not free to choose to visit a doctor or not? If we are free to be an insurance agent or not, are we not free to not buy an insurance agent’s services?
Lipstein makes an argument that we lost our right to not buy insurance because of a law that requires hospitals to render emergency treatment to anyone. This argument is already invalid since neither Lipstein nor the government has the power to eliminate a right. But his argument is economically invalid, as well.
Barnes will treat the same number of emergency cases regardless of compulsory insurance because they are compelled to do so. Further, those who cannot afford insurance today will not be able to afford insurance under the new law. Instead, those who can afford insurance today will pay for the insurance of the indigent. Nothing changes. Except that Lipstein and his authoritarian friends in Washington will gain the power to tell you what you may or may not buy with your money.
In the end, his motives are obvious. Mr. Lipstein would like to use the power of government to force us to buy what he sells. Well, I ain’t buyin’ it, and neither is John Dickinson, Thomas Jefferson, or the majority of Americans.
If you believe that governments cannot create or destroy rights, then you must vote Yes on Proposition C.
Popularity: 6% [?]
Are You Ready to Tea Party?????????
The weekend of September 12, 2010, will be The St. Louis Tea Party Weekend.
We have the Arch steps.
We have the Overlook Stage.
We have the streets.
We have the people.
We have the hunger.
We have the voice.
We have the people.
We have the stars.
We have the plan.
We have the people.
We have the cause.
We have the dedication.
We have the people.
We have the sound.
We have the music.
We have the people.
Details to follow.
If you have out of town relatives who Tea Party, invite them in for the weekend. This St. Louis’s chance to shine, to inspire the nation to Win this Election for the People, for the States, for the Fallen, for our Children.
This is the FINAL TEA PARTY before November 2. MAKE IT COUNT!
This is for you, St. Louis. For the people who fought for Healthcare Freedom, trekking to Jefferson City throughout the winter, handing out flyers on hundred degree days.
This is for the people with mouths taped, unable to speak to the President cum overlord.
This is for the campaign workers who’ve shivered and sweated through a year of dedicated service to candidates, causes, and country.
This is for the noble warriors who stepped in to the Arena, to stand before God and man and have their lives examined for fitness for office.
This is for the candidates who side with their former opponents on August 4th to face down the deadly evil of tyranny.
This is for the family from deep southern Missouri who borrowed the church van to come to St. Louis for the April 15 2009 Tea Party, ferrying two other families with them.
This is for Moose McArthur and all the other heroes recovering from wounds sustained defending us.
This is For The Win.
This is For America.
This is For You.
Popularity: 4% [?]
Shark-Jumping Anderson Cooper Style
Just before her beatification, Shirley Sherrod jumped the shark.
On Thursday, CNN’s Anderson Cooper let the embattled former USDA director talk for an hour. Bad idea. It was bad for CNN, bad for viewers, and really bad for Sherrod, who lost her mind on the air. This is what she said:
I think he’d [Andrew Breitbart would] like to get us stuck back in the times of slavery, That’s where I think he’d like to see all black people end up again.
The sad tale gets sadder.
If Anderson Cooper’s purpose was to expose Sherrod as a bitter, racial, crank, then he did yeoman’s work. In that one hour special of All Shirley, All The Time, Cooper didn’t just knock Sherrod off of her pedestal—a pedestal I helped place her on—he hit her in the head with it.
But the destruction of Shirley Sherrod was not Cooper’s intent, I’m sure. He hoped to canonize the woman. It’s a comedy of errors all around. Sherrod’s media performance was so terrible she was banned form the Sunday talk shows. If we ever hear from her again, it will be after intense media coaching from the best the DNC has to offer. But no coaching or make-up will cover her seething anger toward everything that doesn’t hand her cash.
In the end, Andrew Breitbart—the man who broke the story—got it just about right. He said all along that Sherrod hadn’t gotten past race.
Jonah Goldberg said Shirley Sherrod owes Breitbart an apology. I agree. But don’t hold your breath.
Popularity: 6% [?]
<1 (do the math)
Have you noticed few people call Barack Obama “The One” anymore? “The Golfer” or “The Vacationer” is more like it. Something less than One, by any measure.
Still, with each passing day and each new, permanent crisis, it seems like BO just ain’t up to the job of President. Nothing new. When Jimmy Carter’s incompetence became obvious, the lefty press developed a theory that the job had simply grown too complex for one man. Don’t be surprised to hear it again shortly. They carried that meme right into the GOP convention of 1980 when Walter Cronkite decided that Ronald Reagan needed to appoint Gerald Ford his co-nominee rather than veep.
Of course, Reagan became President and proved, in short order, that not only could one person handle the job, the right person could do it in 6 hour days with a nap to boot. The trick, of course, is finding the right person. And America apparently failed at that challenge in 2008.
I don’t have a bunch of stats and numbers for this, but I do have an awfully strong hunch. Bill Clinton was dealt bad news from time to time, but he always seemed to land on his feet. Barack Obama has good news every now than, and he somehow manages to screw that up, too. Let’s look at headlines of the past week:
- Wikileaks releases ten of thousands of sensitive documents about Afganistan
- Maureen Dowd reveals that Obama’s “white guys” pushed Shirley Sherrod out of her job
- Hugo Chavez, Obama’s best friend in this hemisphere, threatened to cut off oil to the US over Columbia
- Obama backed release of Lockerbie Bomber, we learned
Did I say past week? That was TODAY!
Here’s the thing: today wasn’t a aberration. Every day of the Barack Obama presidency is like this. Or worse. In fact, a few weeks ago, former Obama fawner, Peggy Noonan, declared Obama a “snake-bit President.” And that ain’t good.
But Mr. Obama is starting to look unlucky, and–file this under Mysteries of Leadership–that is dangerous for him because Americans get nervous when they have a snakebit president. They want presidents on whom the sun shines.
Indeed. In 1981, the masters at Bishop DuBourg High School had us all watch Reagan’s Inauguration on TV. We saw it happen live, on CBS, if I remember correctly. Here’s the story from Defense.gov:
In stepped Reagan. After taking the oath of office, Reagan strode to the dais. As the new president began his inaugural address, the sun broke through the clouds. A woman in the crowd said that even Hollywood couldn’t have written a better script.
Reagan’s whole presidency was like that. Not scripted, but lucky. When Dutch (Reagan’s nickname from back in Dixon, Illinois) screwed up, something happened. He’d come out smelling like a rose.
Noonan was right, of course. We want lucky leaders. As goes a song from the musical Pippin, “It’s smarter to be lucky than it’s lucky to be smart.”
I would argue that intelligence, education, and experience, alone, are not enough to be president. Yet Obama appears to lack all of those, in addition to luck and instinct. We know he went to Harvard. But so did George W. Bush. And Hank Paulson. And the CEOs of most of the banks that collapsed in 2008.
So we have a lot of evidence that we hired the wrong dude to lead America. The question becomes “what do we do now?”
There’s only so much we can do, and some of you have been doing it for a while.
- We can keep pressure on Congress to STOP enacting this snake-bit, incompetent President’s agenda.
- We can support candidates who will stop Obama’s agenda in the next Congress.
- We can recruit and train candidates for 2012 who will reverse the damaging growth of government.
- We can pray that our country survives this present crisis of government.
- Until we have a Congress and President who understand the Constitution and voluntarily abide by its limitations on government powers, it’s up to us to remain vigilant against further government growth. And it’s also incumbent upon on us to understand what a colossal mistake we made by electing this snake-bit, failure of a man to our country’s highest office.
Popularity: 4% [?]
Who Wronged Shirley Sherrod?
To no one’s surprise, leftist idiots and hate-mongers like David Frum, Keith Olbermann, and the staff of CNN point their crooked, hostile fingers toward Andrew Breitbart as the cause of Shirley Sherrod’s pain. That’s like blaming Ron Howard for the problems on board Apollo 13.
What Breitbart and Big Government did regarding Ms. Sherrod was identical to what every television news program does every day of the week. They produced a news story based on information reasonably available to them.
Unlike the paid liars and libelists at MediaMatters, ThinkProgress, and MSNBC, Breitbart’s journalistic integrity was close to perfect in the Sherrod story.
- Facts were correct
- Persons were properly identified
- Video and words were propoerty attributed
Further, the tale of redemption part of the speech was absent from the video Breitbart received. We all wish he’d received the whole video. But he didn’t. He honestly believed he had the whole story, and he ran with it.
The accusations against Breitbart, including those leveled by Shirley Sherrod herself, are shameful and unsubstantiated. They reveal the despair of a dying ideology, not the considered judgment of reasonable men and women.
Andrew Breitbart accurately demonstrated with that video the NAACP’s overt racism. That’s why Olbermann and Frum are angry: Andrew let us in on the truth.
But Shirley Sherrod was wronged. She was wronged by Barack Obama, the hyper-racial President who has worked overtime to create racial hostilities. She was wronged by Ben Jealous and the participants of the NAACP’s recent convention whose malicious and bigoted lies about Tea Party attendees demanded Breitbart’s (and others) search for truth. She was wronged by the White House staff’s paranoid fear of the power of Glenn Beck and Fox News.
Mostly, though Shirley Sherrod was wronged by a lifetime of miseducation. Her entire worldview was formed from a pack of lies—lies that all of hear every day, but only some of us are lucky enough to see for what they are.
The public schools, the racist faculties of most American universities, the press, the destructive parasites of the Civil Rights Industry conspire to convince good people like Ms. Sherrod that they are incapable of making it on their own. Over her lifetime, Ms. Sherrod has been pummeled with lies that resulted in a contempt for whites from which she’s happily extracted herself. But she has not overcome the false teachings that others owe her happiness and money.
Let’s pray that Ms. Sherrod will have an epiphany that frees her from hatred of achievement just as she’s been liberated from her former contempt for white people.
Popularity: 8% [?]
Innocent Victims
When the NAACP’s Ben Jealous fired a reckless volley at the Tea Party, he missed his marked and struck an innocent woman.
One week ago tonight, the news cycle was alive with the excitement of a heavyweight fight. The NAACP’s Ben Jealous needed to raise money and restore a sagging membership. He decided to pick a fight with the Tea Party.
On Monday, the NAACP leaked a resolution to the Kansas City Star that stated:
The resolution . . . calls upon “all people of good will to repudiate the racism of the Tea Parties, and to stand in opposition to its drive to push our country back to the pre-civil rights era. [emphasis added]”
By painting as ‘racist’ the 20 million people who have attended a Tea Party event, the NAACP forced the hand of Tea Party organizers. That response came from the St. Louis Tea Party with a resolution condeming the NAACP for lowering itself into the gutter.
The fight continued into the Sunday talk shows. The NAACP backtracked, softened its resolution, and softened its rhetoric in the wake of criticism. At times, Ben Jealous even tried to claim he’d never said what he’d said.
Then on Monday, video emerged of a USDA bureaucrat, Shirley Sherrod, addressing an NAACP meeting. In the video, Sherrod talked about withholding information and assistance from farmer because the farmer was white. The audience approved. The woman was forced to resign under pressure from the White House. The NAACP denounced Sherrod’s blatant racism.
But that was only half the story.
If anyone had bothered to watch the whole tape (over 40 minutes long), they’d have learned Sherrod’s story was a story of redemption.
Shirley ended up going above and beyond to help the farmer save his farm. She got over his whiteness and helped his humanity. Though she tells her story in subtle tones, it is a rich story of transformation.
Starting fights is easy. I’ve done it myself. But the consequences are often far worse than intended. The suffering rarely limits itself to the combatants. There’s always collateral damage.
Perhaps the best thing to come from Ben Jealous’s recklessness was not a discussion of race, which I believe we have too many of. The lesson here is: be very careful before throwing the first stone, because you have no idea who it will strike.
I said nasty things about Shirley Sherrod yesterday online. I hope no one read them, but I know that’s a false hope. I am sorry. I should have waited for all of the facts, but I did not. Shame on me.
Take an hour and listen. You may not agree with everything Shirley says. That’s okay. But I don’t think you’ll be able to avoid the conclusion that is a good woman trying to do the Lord’s work the best she can with the life she’s given. That’s about as American as you get.
UPDATE: Or maybe not. Dan Riehl thinks I’m being a softy. Is she a Marxist and an unrepentant racist? I’ve been too willing to see the best in people before.
Dana Loesch has more. She points out that Sherrod calls out the NAACP for starting a fight where none was needed. But also points out that the “post-racial” Obama has intentionally fomented racial mistrust that has fostered this nasty environment.
Darin Morley: “Fifty years ago we were segregated by law. Today, we’re segregated by our own choices.”
Popularity: 8% [?]
I know where you’ll be on July 24
You’ll be in Grove Park in Grafton, Illinois, for:
ALTON IL. T.E.A PARTY FIRST ANNIVERSARY
“1776 FREEDOM RALLY”
Saturday, July 24th 4pm-7pm
Think about it. You’ve Fast Eddie’s right there. You’ve got two of the most haunted towns in America with Grafton and Alton. Great history, including homes that were critical to the Underground Railroad.
In short, you get to help make history in a place where history was made.
I am so honored to return to speak for the second year in a row. Even better, Dr. Gina Loudon, hostess of the hottest new show on radio, will be there, too. Not to mention the great people of the Alton Tea Party and 9-12 Project, Veteran Michelle Sharp, and more.
I have to tell you about the Alton Tea Party and 9-12 Project people. These are the gold standard of get out the vote heroes. By turning on the afterburners, they made history in Madison County at the Illinois primary this year. How so?
Madison County is typically a 2:1 Democrat vote in primaries. Not this year. Because of the ridiculous efforts of those two groups, Madison votes 3:1 Republican. Not only that, their voters understood First Principles. The demonstrated that understanding by voting over 40 percent for Adam Andrzjewski, the solid conservative who earned Lech Walesa’s endorsement. That’s 40 percent out of field of 6 candidates.
Their efforts will make a difference again in November. Why not make the short drive to Grafton for this event. Then we’ll all stop at Fast Eddie’s for a cold one. You might even want to book a room at Pere Marquette State Park or one of the awesome, old hotels in Grafton or Alton.
Please plan to join us at Grove Park in Alton next Saturday, July 24, at 4:00 p.m. It’s been a long 17 months, I know. But we’ve slackened the pace lately. Now it’s time to gear up for Election Season. And there’s no better organizations in the country to kick off elections than the Alton Tea Party and 9-12 Project.
Popularity: 7% [?]
The Tea Party Is Intolerant . . . of Racism
Between a touch of the flu and the flurry of activity over this very issue, I missed the best, most direct breakdown of Ben Jealous’s misguided and hypocritical attack on the Tea Party. Read this column by Michael Graham on BostonHerald.com dated Thursday, July 15.
Money quote:
When you’re looking for bigots at a Tea Party rally, they’re on the fringe. When you’re looking for them at the NAACP, they’re on stage.
Ouch.
When we find bigots, even on the fringe, at a St. Louis event, we drive them out. And we don’t hide the fact that they were there.
At the April 15 Tea Party in Clayton, MO, Adam Sharp and several others drove from the park a guy wearing Nazi crap. They did it by standing next to him with a sign that read “Fake Tea Partier” while Sharp verbally challenged him. Lee Fang, a “researcher” with American Progress with a history of shredding the truth, has doctored Sharp’s great video (without legal permission). Here’s what actually happened.
Perhaps if the NAACP treated the racists and anti-Semites in their midst the way the Tea Party does, Mr. Jealous wouldn’t be so busy back-peddling from his hypocritical lies today.
By “racists” and “anti-Semites,” I mean Louis Farrakhan, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Jesse Jackson, and Al Sharpton, to name only a few. As Mr. Graham pointed out, “This is the leadership of the NAACP, not some lone kook in a vast crowd.”
Now that the President and Joe Biden have admitted that the Tea Party is not a racist movement, it seems Mr. Jealous and the NAACP are all alone, twisting in the wind.
Mr. Jealous seemed to want us to admit we’re intolerant? We are. We don’t tolerate racism. Period.
Popularity: 7% [?]
Loading ...
0 Comments