Despicable Hillary Exposed by FBI

Reading Time: 5 minutes

Have you ever met someone who’s just nasty? Mean? Self-centered? Treats “little people” like dirt?

If you answered “yes” to any of these questions, you’ve probably met Hillary Clinton. Hillary is likely a psychopath according to official FBI documents released Friday.

What is psychopathy? For the answer, let’s go to the book Almost a Psychopath (h/t Eric Barker):

Psychopathy is a psychological condition in which the individual shows a profound lack of empathy for the feelings of others, a willingness to engage in immoral and antisocial behavior for short-term gains, and extreme egocentricity.

You’ll recognize all of these symptoms in the FBI witness accounts of Hillary Clinton in a moment. First, though, Eric Barker does a great job of teaching you how to spot a psychopath.

And you know that old saying about not trusting people who are nice to you but mean to waiters at a restaurant? Turns out it’s true. Psychopaths and narcissists are extremely status conscious with a strong tendency to “kiss up and kick down.”

From Without Conscience:

Referring to psychologist Harry Levinson’s work on healthy and unhealthy narcissism in managers, Hogan noted that unhealthy narcissists have an almost grandiose sense of certainty and a disdain for subordinates. “They are particularly good at ingratiating themselves with their seniors but brutalize their juniors,” he is quoted as saying.

[Here’s a test to tell you who to vote for]

Now, let’s see what the FBI witnesses say of life with Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State. According to sworn statements by Hillary’s former security agents, Hillary Clinton regularly:

  • Verbally abused and intimidated her juniors
  • Disrespected ambassadors
  • Recklessly endangered lives of subordinates by ordering them to break security protocol in hostile situations for her own convenience
  • Flouted State Department and military security rules and procedures
  • Stole government property for her personal gain
  • Generally treated everybody like shit

Here are some highlights, via Zero Hedge. Remember, this is from an official FBI witness statement released on Friday against the FBI’s wishes. You can read the whole thing here:

Horrible treatment of subordinates:

[Redacted] explained that CLINTON’s treatment of DS agents on her protective detail was so contemptuous that many of them sought reassignment or employment elsewhere. Prior to CLINTON’s tenure, being an agent on the Secretary of State’s protective detail was seen as an honor and privilege reserved for senior agents. However, by the end of CLINTON’s tenure, it was staffed largely with new agents because it was difficult to find senior agents willing to work for her. [Redactedclaimed to have had at least one conversation with Secret Service agents who experienced the same poor treatment.

Stealing from government offices:

Early in CLINTON’s tenure as Secretary of State, she and her staff were observed removing lamps and furniture from the State Department which were transported to her residence in Washington, D.C.

Violating security protocols and mistreatment of ambassadors:

[Redacted] I served briefly on former Secretary CLINTON’s protective detail in 2009. From her own experience, and information obtained through [Redacted] and other agents, [Redacted] described a “stark difference” between RICE and CLINTON with regard to obedience to security and diplomatic protocols. RICE observed strict adherence to State Department security and diplomatic protocols while CLINTON frequently and “blatantly” disregarded them. For example, it is standard security and diplomatic protocol for the Secretary of State to ride in the armored limousine with the local U.S. ambassador when traveling in countries abroad. It is seen as diplomatic protocol for the Secretary of State to arrive at foreign diplomatic functions with the local ambassador; however, CLINTON refused to do so, instead choosing to be accompanied in the limousine by her Chief of Staff, HUMA ABEDIN. This frequently resulted in complaints by ambassadors who were insulted and embarrassed by this breach of protocol.  [Redacted] explained that CLINTON’s protocol breaches were well known throughout Diplomatic Security and were “abundant.”

Putting innocent subordinates in harm’s way:

On a trip to Jakarta, Indonesia, in early 2009, CLINTON requested to visit an area of Jakarta that presented security and safety challenges. This visit was reportedly for a photo opportunity regarding CLINTON’s “clean cooking stoves” initiative. The DS advance team recommended against traveling to this area because the route could not be secured and was lined with dangerous circumstances and individuals. As such, the DS advance team recommended in writing that this excursion be stricken from the schedule but were told by DS management that it was going to happen because “she wanted it.” DS agents felt this excursion into potentially hostile areas placed CLINTON, her staff, the media, and her security detail in unnecessary danger in order to conduct a photo opportunity for “her election campaign.” 

Colluding with a fawning press to cover up her misdeeds:

DS agents had the perception that CLINTON was using her position as Secretary of State to campaign for President of the United States. DS agents felt CLINTON traveled with hand-picked media who would present her in favorable light in order to garner political support. It was also believed that CLINTON disregarded security and diplomatic protocols, occasionally without regard for the safety of her staff and protection detail, in order to gain favorable press.

Endangering the lives of subordinates again:

CLINTON traveled in an armored vehicle whose passenger windows do not open. This is a design feature for the protectiOn of the occupants. However, the driver’s window does open slightly. On one occasion while travelin  to Palestine CLINTON ordered the limousine driver, believed to be [Redacted] to open the window while in “occupied territory”, referring to a dangerous area of the West Bank. [Redacted] initially declined to respond to CLINTON’s request; however, repeated demands by CLINTON forced him to open his window despite the danger to himself and the occupants.

Refusing to follow the law on information security:

By DS security policy, no cell phones are allowed inside the SCIF and DS agents, officers, and staff are required to leave their cell phones outside the door in secure lockers. CLINTON refused to abide to this security requirement and brought her cell phone, believed to be a Blackberry, inside the SCIF where a DS agent assigned to Post 1 was required to guard it. DS agents were indignant that they were required to follow security policy but CLINTON made herself exempt from the same regulations.

Let’s look at that psychopathy checklist, shall we?

  • profound lack of empathy for the feelings of others. CHECK
  • a willingness to engage in immoral and antisocial behavior for short-term gains. CHECK
  • extreme egocentricity. CHECK

You might be tempted to apply this checklist to Trump (or anybody else who’s ever run for public office). But Trump fails that first criterion. How many times have you heard Trump apologize for his transgressions? He just apologized, numerous times, for the Billy Bush remarks (which weren’t what you heard they were). He said he probably didn’t deserve support from evangelical Christians. He’s helped numerous people who could do nothing for him.

You’ve never heard Hillary Clinton apologize for belittling and endangering the lives of her subordinates. And you’ve never heard that Trump put people’s lives in danger for his own thrills.

Hillary Clinton acts like a psychopath. Even if she didn’t kill Seth Rich, Ron Brown, Antonin Scalia, and dozens of other people who mysteriously died after learning bad stuff about the Clintons, Hillary treats subordinates like dirt. She is a far worse human than Trump has ever been accused of being. And the FBI confirms this.

Confused by the choice for President? This test will help you.

P.S. The FBI redacted the witness’s name. Maybe they wanted to protect her from the Clinton Crime Family. Don’t be surprised if [Redacted] gets “suicided” shortly. They all do.


CNN Liars Slither to New All-Time Low as Politico Hits Rock Bottom

Reading Time: 2 minutes

CNN is so afraid people will find out they’ve been lied to that CNN is lying harder than ever.

It is perfectly legal to visit the Wikileaks.com website. You can even copy information found on the site.  Yet CNN’s paid liars are telling viewers it’s against the law. Plus, they’re saying the only way you are allowed to learn the content of the Wikileaks documents is to have it filtered through CNN’s official state-sponsored Department of Truth. Check out this damning video:

“It’s different for the media, so everything you’re learning, you’re learning from us.”

Wow. Do you feel like a serf now, or what?

As horrible and dishonest as CNN is, Politico is even worse. Politico’s Glenn Thrush admitted that he considers himself a political “hack.” He let’s Hillary’s campaign edit his stories before publishing. Via Zero Hedge:


You can expect to hear all kinds of media people tell you that this is standard–to run stories by subjects for comment or correction. It is a professional courtesy.

And it’s 100% pure pasture-grade bullshit. 

I may not be famous like John Podesta, but I’ve been written up in newspapers and magazines plenty of times. Never has a reporter run anything past me. Never. Not once.

And if @GlennThrush’s action was commonplace, why would he admonish John Podesta “Please don’t share or tell anyone I did this?” Huh?

I have told people “please don’t tell anyone I did this,” too. Nothing that I’m proud of. We ask for secrecy when we’re doing something we know is WRONG!

If you still think your opinion of Donald Trump is based on truth, you might want to re-read this post from the top. Maybe you should ask someone you really trust to read it to you. Explain it, even.

The press has been lying about Trump for a year. They’ve been lying about Hillary for decades. While Trump has some obvious flaws, he loves America and he wants to make it great for people like you and me. You probably know that elites have been eating out our subsistence for years. Trump wants to drag them away from the trough.

Hillary, on the other hand, is a wicked, nasty witch. Tomorrow I’ll tell you how the FBI confirmed that Hillary Clinton is a disgusting beast


Killing Scalia: The Clinton Crime Family

Reading Time: 4 minutes

Do you think the Clinton Crime Family whacked Antonin Scalia? You will soon if you let yourself read this and all the links. But first, a strange call I had last week.

Something Unrelated

At the end of our talk, the reporter said, “do you mind if I ask you about something else? It has nothing to do with my article, and I won’t write about it.”

“Uh, sure,” I said. I was a little apprehensive.

“Do you believe the Clinton’s killed Ron Brown?” the reporter asked.

Here we go, I thought. I’m going to  get called a conspiracy whack job.

“I have no idea,” I said. “I do know reporters who have looked into the case and no longer call the idea crazy. Even some skeptics trying to debunk the assassination story have come away uncertain. And I’m sort of a libertarian. I really don’t trust the government.”

“I don’t trust the Clintons,” the reporter said. “I covered them back in the early nineties in Arkansas. During the campaign in ninety-two. And in Washington some.”

We talked a little more. The reporter knew Ron Brown and liked him. “He told you the truth.” And she knows the Clintons. They are not like Ron Brown. The Clintons are mean people. And they lie to reporters. They lie to everybody.

[Read more about the assassination of Ron Brown here]

Conspiracy Theory

I expected to be called a conspiracy theorist when I posted the Ron Brown story. Instead, I’ve received only worried acknowledgments that the Clintons are capable of anything, including assassination.

The reporter is a veteran, serious, established journalist. You’d know her name if I told you. Like all good reporters, she’s skeptical and meticulous. She checks things out.

And like everyone who’s checked into the Ron Brown assassination, she’s not sure. She doesn’t believe it was an accident, but she can’t prove it wasn’t.

Scalia Wet Work

Then today we learned that Hillary associates John Podesta and Steve Elmendorf exchanged emails that appeared to reference an assassination the day before Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was found dead with a pillow over his head at a remote lodge.


“Wet works” is spy-talk for “assassination.”

Scalia died in a lodge owned by a well-connected Democrat. Alex Newman wrote in The New American, February 16, 2016:

Suspicions and unanswered questions surrounding the surprise weekend death of pro-Constitution U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia are swirling around the Internet and beyond. Many of the concerns center on the fact that the man who found Scalia’s body, businessman and Democrat donor John Poindexter, said the late justice was discovered with “a pillow over his head.” Also sparking alarm among some commentators and suspicious citizens are reports and official statements indicating that no autopsy will be conducted, despite contradictory claims surrounding the cause of death. Even the establishment press, apparently unfamiliar with the definition of the term “conspiracy theory,” has started reporting on the concerns and questions, albeit generally with a dismissive tone. Cries for an autopsy and congressional probe are growing louder, too, even as the White House, Democrats, and leftists waste no time in plotting to name a successor and tip the balance of power. The atmosphere is getting very tense.

Suspicious Death

You probably remember that a lot of suspicions surrounded Scalia’s death.

  • He showed no signs of health problems at dinner the night before
  • He went to be at 9:00 p.m.
  • According to Democrat John Poindexter, owner of the lodge where Scalia died, Scalia “refused” a security detail for the night
  • John Poindexter discovered Scalia’s body the next morning
  • Scalia was dressed with a pillow over his head
  • Scalia’s bed looked unused, as if he took a nap on top of the blankets
  • But he had a pillow over his head
  • And there was no autopsy

The government refused to allow an autopsy on Ron Brown’s body, too, after a US Marshall determined cause of death over the phone, via The New American:

Another top media personality asking questions was Michael Savage, among the top five most influential and most widely listened to talk-radio hosts in America. “Was [Scalia] murdered?” Savage asked during his program. “We need a Warren Commission-like federal investigation…. This is serious business.” He also called for an immediate autopsy, according to media reports. In a follow-up post on his website, Savage also wondered how the left would react if anti-U.S. Constitution zealot Ruth Bader Ginsburg died under similar circumstances with a pillow on her face in the final year of a Republican administration at a property owned by a mega-donor for the GOP. And in an interview with Savage on Tuesday, leading GOP presidential contender Donald Trump, when asked whether the candidate would support a Warren Commission-style probe, noted that “they found a pillow on his face, which is a pretty unusual place to find a pillow.” Trump did not say whether he would support a commission.

“There was no medical examiner present. There was no one who declared the death who was there. It was done by telephone from a U.S. Marshal appointed by Obama himself,” Savage said, outlining some of the many reasons why suspicion, whether warranted or not, is spreading like wildfire across America. “The question is, is it a conspiracy theory to ask questions that are so obviously in need of answer, or is it just common sense. And where is the common sense both in the press and the Republican Party. The answer is nowhere.” Of course, questions, by definition, cannot be a “conspiracy theory, despite the establishment media’s misuse of the term.

It looked in February like Scalia was assassinated, and it looks now like Team Hillary conducted the murder. Why else would “wet work” make Hillary Dems “buckle up and double down?”

The Clinton Body Count

The more you read about the Clinton body count, the more you believe it’s possible that the Clintons have ordered the assassinations of many, many people. Not just enemies, but people with information. People in the way.

Scalia was in the way. Now he’s not.

Call me crazy, but that conversation with a veteran reporter tells me the Clintons are capable of anything, including assassinations. And I think they could have killed Scalia.

P.S. If you’re wondering what Vineyard they’re referring to, see The Gateway Pundit.



The Art of Lying

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Lying is tough business.

People believe lies with more details. Time, date, people, exact words, what people were wearing, sequences of events. All that. So liars usually provide some gripping details to make their lies more believable.

In casual conversation, this works. Once some sucker buys your lie, you’re pretty much in the clear. The problem comes when you broadcast your lie for maximum coverage. The more people who hear the lie, the more people try to verify those details.

Details like dates and people.

Details like sequences of events and how things work.

Two of the women who accused Donald Trump of inappropriate contact today lied poorly. Oh, their lies were weapons grade, Olympic class lies in casual conversation. They provided such vivid, specific detail that no one would doubt them.

But when their lies were broadcast, people tried to verify those details. And it turns out those women lied.

First, there’s Jessica Leed, a friend of Hillary’s who recalls specific details of an encounter on an airplane with Donald Trump 30 years ago. Two of Leed’s details destroy her story.

  1. She said she was upgraded to first class. But 30 years ago, airlines didn’t upgrade passengers. 
  2. She said Donald Trump raised the armrest between their seats. But first class seats never had armrests you could raise. They’re fixed, unlike the ones in coach.

Again, if she told this lie to a friend who’s prone to believe her, the lie would work. But when the whole world hears the lie, the truth emerges. Jessica Leed lied.

Then there’s Mindy McGillivray. Mindy says Trump groped her, and she remembers the details precisely. She was at Mar-a-lago attending a Ray Charles concert. The date was January 24, 2003. The concert was over. Ray was getting ready to leave. Someone grapped her ass, and Trump was the only person behind her. Sounds so plausible with all those details seared into her mind, doesn’t it?

Only problem is, there was no such concert. As Gateway Pundit points out:

Mindy McGillivray says Donald Trump nudged her at a concert at Mar-a-Lago at a concert on January 24, 2003. She went public with her story this week.

There was no such concert at Mar-a-Lago on January 24, 2003.

Again, the specifics that make a lie believable also make it debunkable.

Remember this about lying well: as your audience increases, your specificity decreases. While vague recollections might increase doubt, they also make your story harder to disprove.

Jessica Leed and Mindy McGillivray learned this lesson the hard way. When it comes to lying, they’re not true artists but mere dabblers.

CORRECTED: A previous version misstated the date in question as January 24, 2009.


Hillary Told Us Trump Won

Reading Time: 2 minutes

I really want to go to bed, but my brain won’t  sleep until I type this out.

Hillary Clinton told us Trump won the debate with her final answer. Final answer.

An audience member asked the closing question. He challenged the candidates to say something nice about their opponents. Hillary went first.

The right way to answer those screwball questions is to say something nice and sit down. I’ll explain why in a moment.

Hillary began by talking briefly about Donald Trump’s great kids. She got that part right.

But then Hillary went on the attack about negative campaigning. She talked for over two minutes, beyond her allotted time. This time, though, I don’t think Trump minded.

When Trump’s turn came, he nailed it. He called his opponent “a fighter,” and he piled on about her refusal to give up.

We all know Trump respects the hell out of fighters. His compliment was sincere as they get.

And then Trump sat down.


Here’s why Hillary’s answer was so bad and why she knew she lost. 

When a voter asks a softball question, people want and expect a softball answer. We all wanted to feel good about something. We all know this race is nasty. We wanted a tiny respite from that nastiness. But Hillary just reminded us. She turned a softball question into an ugly answer. Because she had to try something.

Trump knew he’d won. He didn’t need to land a punch after the bell. He knew it, and he went to his corner. Like a champion. Like a gentleman.

Hillary knew she’d lost. She needed to try something to even the score, so she took a chance with a cheap shot after the bell, over the ref’s shoulder. She was cheap and ugly. And her gambit failed.

By hitting after the bell, Hillary told us all she lost. She telegraphed the outcome. 

Trump is back on top. Watch him rise. Greatest 3rd Act ever.


The Flies Are Coming Home to Roost

Reading Time: 1 minutes

Frank Luntz—no fan of Donald J. Trump—said it best: he came into the second debate believing the race was over, but he came out believing Trump is back in the race.

I realize CNN bought a poll that said Clinton won the debate. But CNN has a history of lying, cheating, and hiding facts. I wouldn’t bet a wooden nickel on anything I heard on CNN.

I watched most of the debate at a bar in South St. Louis. The crowd was there to watch football. Mostly non-partisan, apolitical folks. But they quickly became Trump fans.

As you think about it now, you might realize the race is on and Trump is as likely to win as he was before. Trump looked like the President we need and the President we want. He owned the stage while Hillary squirmed under the weight of logic, reason, facts, and a fly.

Yes, a fly.

A filthy, manure-munching fly that wouldn’t leave Hillary alone. Like a metaphor from Westworld. Jim Hoft calls is an omen.


Droids eventually fall to flesh and blood humans with souls. For all his flaws, Trump is human. In fact, his flaws make him human.

Delores, the droid on Westworld, reached the point of artificial intelligence that she could swat the fly that dogged her.

Hillary is still 100% artificial.

I’m guessing there’s a fly in Ann Wagner‘s face tonight. It’s eating the egg.


FILE - In this Oct. 8, 2010, file photo members of the U.S. Supreme Court gather for a group portrait at the Supreme Court in Washington. Seated from left are: Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Antonin Scalia, Chief Justice John Roberts, Associate Justices Anthony M. Kennedy, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Standing, from left are: Associate Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Breyer, Samuel Alito Jr., and Elena Kagan. In an era when three women, a Hispanic and an African-American sit on the court and white men constitute a bare majority of the nine justices, the court is more diverse than the lawyers who argue before it. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

How to Act Like You Learned Something About Trump

Reading Time: 1 minutes

People in the media and the GOP are acting like they learned something on Friday. That’s when the Washington Post released an audio (later conjoined with video) of Donald Trump talking lewd about his exploits with women.

I say media people and Republicans are  “acting” like they learned something, because they didn’t. We didn’t. Everybody who’s paid attention to the race (or pop culture) already knew how Trump is. Everybody knows Trump brags about his sexual prowess and how women melt around him. There’s nothing new, but a few very emotional people who have trouble separating their feelings from their thoughts give into the impulse to act like they’ve learned something. No one’s that ignorant.

But something bigger remains the same. Antonin Scalia is still dead. The first significant act of the new Congress and the new administration will be to fill that empty seat on the Supreme Court.

Scalia’s seat will be filled by someone like Elena Kagan or someone like Mike Lee. The person who appoints that replacement will be someone who covers up her own crimes and her husband’s rapes, or someone who brags about women desiring him because he’s a wealthy star.

Again, nothing’s changed.

If you want a Supreme Court that rules like Elena Kagan, vote for Clinton. If you want a Supreme Court that thinks like Mike Lee, vote for Trump.

You’ve learned nothing, so don’t act like you have.


We Heard From Ann Wagner. Now Let’s Hear From the Clintons’ Victims

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Today, Rep. Ann Wagner (R-MO) abandoned her party’s nominee to support a rape accomplice for President. Ann Wagner has lost her moral authority on all matters outside of her own home. I call on Mrs. Wagner to resign from the House of Representatives and to retire gracefully from public life.

Mrs. Wagner seems to believe that being a woman gives her some unique moral vantage point. She forgets that she’s not the only woman in America.

click here to read my take on Trump’s Access Hollywood remarks.

The women who really have a unique moral vantage point on Trump and the Clintons are the many, many women Bill Clinton has raped, molested, and abused. These women were also abused, threatened, belittled, intimidated, and bullied by Mrs. Clinton.

Here’s what a few of these women have to say:



Those are some thoughts from Bill and Hillary Clinton’s sexual abuse victims. Compared to their voices, Ann Wagner spews meaningless, selfish babble.

Finally, I see that Senator Roy Blunt is sticking with Trump. Good for Roy. I am glad I endorsed him.